Peer-Group Performance Could Be An Issue For Some Boards
Phillips 66’s situation is a reminder that evaluating performance versus peers can be significant for the following reasons.
Phillips 66’s situation is a reminder that evaluating performance versus peers can be significant for the following reasons.
When facing say-on-pay headwinds, use the CD&A proactively as a tool to provide compelling rationale and context, and to bring the reader inside the boardroom.
Any company that has had negative shareholder returns for a year or more must begin the process of crafting a story that demonstrates to investors that the board and management have a grasp of the company’s current situation and a viable plan for long-term growth.
How far are shareholders willing to go to curb rising executive compensation?
If they haven’t already, companies should prepare to comply with the rule and have the appropriate disclosures ready by the end of the year.
A closer look at findings of the latest PwC survey reveals directors eager to improve their boards’ effectiveness.
Chief Executive Group exists to improve the performance of U.S. CEOs, senior executives and public-company directors, helping you grow your companies, build your communities and strengthen society. Learn more at chiefexecutivegroup.com.