Political Spending Disclosures Will Set 2020 Board Agendas
Political spending disclosure is on the minds of many shareholders one year ahead of the 2020 elections and corporate boards should take notice.
Political spending disclosure is on the minds of many shareholders one year ahead of the 2020 elections and corporate boards should take notice.
Corporate board members may want to reexamine whether sitting on two or more boards is in their long-term best interest. If they don’t, investors may be doing it for them.
Corporate boards should take note that the situation at Progenics Pharmaceuticals has resulted in a proxy advisory firm validating a call for “shareholder board oversight.” Serving on a board that has been sighted for oversight by its investors could have an effect on future board appointments.
This article has been updated with corrections since it first appeared. Mylan, the generic and specialty pharmaceutical maker, last week agreed to consider a shareholder proposal that
On June 19, employees of Alphabet, the parent company of Google, protested the company’s labor practices and business policies at its annual meeting in Sunnyvale, Calif. Should worker concerns become a higher priority on corporate board agendas?
Now that State Street has identified climate change risk as a priority in the evaluation of its portfolio of companies, what does this mean for directors?